Monthly Archives: December 2015

2015 blog summary

I realise that I’ve already written a review of 2015, but partly as a result of Willard’s comments, and partly as a result of Stoat’s post, I realised that I hadn’t really summarised the blog activity. So, here it is; … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, Personal, Science, Severe Events | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

2015 in review

Since I have a few free moments, I thought I would briefly review what’s happened in 2015. If you want something a bit more thorough, you could read Greg Laden’s or Skeptical Science’s reviews. After 2014 was the hottest year … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, ENSO, Global warming, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | 62 Comments

Zero emissions

David Roberts has a recent post that I’ve only just noticed called why zero is a better climate target than 2 degrees. The zero refers to net global emissions, not to temperature. The argument is essentially that zero is a … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, IPCC, Science | Tagged , , , , , | 74 Comments

Merry Christmas

Posting has been rather light recently, and I expect that to continue for a while. I’m quite enjoying doing other things, but I suspect I’ll be back to posting in the not too distant future. However, since it’s Christmas Eve, … Continue reading

Posted in Personal | Tagged , | 16 Comments

RCPs as scenarios

Fabius Maximus has a guest post on Climate Etc. in which he focuses on RCP8.5. RCP8.5 is a Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) that leads to a change in forcing of 8.5Wm-2 in 2100. Focusing on this particular RCP seems to … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, IPCC, Science | Tagged , , , , , | 179 Comments

Forcing efficacy

There’s a new paper, discussing climate sensitivity, by Marvel, Schmidt, Miller & Nazarenko called Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings. Before I discuss the paper, I should really advertise the lead author’s blog, arguably one of … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Gavin Schmidt, Global warming, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | 110 Comments

Pragmatism

It’s been interesting to see the different responses to the Paris agreement. James Hansen calls it a fraud (Richard Erskine thinks he’s wrong). Kevin Anderson is a bit more measured. Others are more positive and optimistic. I find myself sympathysing … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, IPCC, Science | Tagged , , | 20 Comments

Consilience of the evidence

I was wanting to briefly highlight a David Roberts post called the two key points that climate “skeptics” miss. I was only going to comment on one of the points, which was about the convergence of all the evidence, typically … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Gavin Schmidt, Global warming, Science | Tagged , , , , | 106 Comments

1.5C?

I think that the negotiators in Paris are pretty close to reaching an agreement (may have already done so). There’s a draft version here. Maybe the most interesting aspect of the agreement is the paragraph below: Emphasizing with serious concern … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | 56 Comments

Dogma?

I watched some of the Congressional hearing yesterday on Data or dogma? It consisted of evidence from four people who I shall politely describe as contrarians (Judith Curry, John Christy, William Happer, and Mark Steyn) and one person who had … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Gavin Schmidt, Global warming, Judith Curry, Satire, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 142 Comments