Recent Comments
izen on Doomsday scenarios danialcblog on Off for a couple of weeks Susan Anderson on Off for a couple of weeks Steven Mosher on Doomsday scenarios -1=e^iπ on Doomsday scenarios -1=e^iπ on Doomsday scenarios Mal Adapted on Doomsday scenarios Ragnaar on Off for a couple of weeks Keith McClary on Off for a couple of weeks Mal Adapted on Doomsday scenarios 
Rachel Squirrel- A new Doctor Who and speed tourism July 16, 2017
- Rabett Run
- The joy of meh over California climate law July 21, 2017
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- Is nitpicking a climate doomsday warning allowed? July 23, 2017
- RealClimate
- Joy plots for climate change July 22, 2017
- Stoat
- The management apologise for more inconvenience July 16, 2017
- Open Mind
- Does Willis Eschenbach have Any Honor? July 22, 2017
- Climate denial crock of the week
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- NOAA's new ERSST V5 Sea surface temperature and TempLS July 21, 2017
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Why We Became Scientists: Dunderhead April 1, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- All the pollen July 22, 2017
- James’s Empty Blog
- Bishop's Castle Tandem Triathlon July 7, 2017
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Mallemaroking
- The bathymetry in front of iceberg A68 July 18, 2017
Monthly Archives: March 2016
Free speech in academia
I wrote a post a while ago about the newly formed Heterodox Academy. The basic motivation of the Heterodox Academy is [t]o increase viewpoint diversity in the academy, with a special focus on the social sciences. The basic idea being … Continue reading
Posted in ClimateBall, Personal
Tagged Academia, Free speech, Heterodox Academy, Irony, Jason Stanley
353 Comments
Grant troughers?
I wandered over to Paul Homewood’s site, and discovered his most recent post was about Royal Society Fellowship. He remarks that: It won’t come as any surprise to learn that there are many other climate scientists at the trough. and … Continue reading
Reblog: On Hansen et al.
I haven’t really had a chance to properly read the new Hansen et al. paper (apart from the reviewers, who does?). However, it is clearly a paper that has already had impact and somewhat divided opinions, so I asked Peter … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, Science
Tagged ICARUS, James Hansen, Peer-review, Peter Thorne, sea level rise
179 Comments
Extreme events
I had thought of writing about Hansen’s recent paper, but I’m not really sure what to say about it. I did read some of the reviews – Thorne, Archer, Ruddiman – and, unsurprisingly, there appear to be some valid criticisms. … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, IPCC
Tagged Climate denial, Extreme events, James Hansen, Michael Kelly
104 Comments
Physicists!
There’s a classic xkcd cartoon (on the right) that is meant to illustrate the arrogance of physicists. As one myself I, of course, think it’s a gross generalisation, but there is certainly an element of truth, as illustrated by the … Continue reading
Some of my own science, for a change
There’s not much point in running a science blog if you don’t discuss your own research now and again. The reason I had thought of writing about it is that, last week, I was at a meeting I had helped … Continue reading
Ending the antagonistic climate debate
I wanted to write another post about the recent paper by Sharman and Howarth that considers why climate scientists and skeptical voices participate in the climate debate? This is partly because Reich suggested that maybe there is something to learn … Continue reading
