Recent Comments
Willard on Evidence-led? smallbluemike on Evidence-led? Willard on The Auditing Problem Willard on The Auditing Problem RickA on Evidence-led? Mal Adapted on Evidence-led? Steven Mosher on The Auditing Problem Willard on The Auditing Problem Willard on The Auditing Problem Steven Mosher on The Auditing Problem 
Rachel Squirrel- Loch an Eilein and Landmark Forest Adventure Park September 20, 2020
- Rabett Run
- A cheer for Ginsburg, and a wish that she retired in 2013 September 19, 2020
- HotWhopper
- Apologies August 4, 2020
- Variable Variability
- A primer on herd immunity for Social Darwinists August 30, 2020
- RealClimate
- New studies confirm weakening of the Gulf Stream circulation (AMOC) September 17, 2020
- Stoat
- Russell on Rouseau and the Romantics September 14, 2020
- Open Mind
- COVID-19: Failure July 23, 2020
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Looking Back at a Look Forward September 20, 2020
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS August global down by 0.05°C from July. September 14, 2020
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Simplistic and Dangerous Models April 20, 2020
- James’s Empty Blog
- SAGE versus reality September 15, 2020
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Digital conferences – how might they work? May 10, 2020
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- The Many Worlds of Quantum Tuition September 10, 2020
Monthly Archives: September 2017
A bit more about carbon budgets
I’ve been mostly at home today since we had a power cut at work and the site ended up being closed. So, I thought I would post a few more thoughts about the Millar et al. 1.5oC carbon budget paper. … Continue reading
Climateball, GWPF style
I came across a Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) post called climate scientists shoot the messenger. That it’s from the Forum, rather than the Foundation, may be relevant. It discusses the recent Millar et al. paper (that I discussed here … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Comedy, Scientists
Tagged climate scientists, Global Warming Policy Forum, GWPF, Millar et al., Own Goal
41 Comments
Assessing global warming
A couple of years ago I wrote a joint post with Roger Pielke Sr that discussed assessing anthropogenic global warming. The post basically used changes in ocean heat content to assess anthropogenic global warming. The basic idea (which is not … Continue reading
Own goal
I thought I might comment a bit further on the recent Millar et al. paper, [e]mission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C, that I discussed in this post. I’ve found the whole public dialogue about this paper … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, Global warming, Research, Science
Tagged Carbon budgets, James Delingpole, Millar et al.
45 Comments
Andy Skuce
As many probably already know, Andy Skuce passed away last week. Andy was someone I greatly respected who made a significant, positive contribution to the dialogue about climate and energy. Andy was a key contributor to Skeptical Science, and wrote … Continue reading
More time …. really?
A recent paper about [e]mission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C essentially argues that it is still possible to follow an emission pathway that will give us a good chance of keeping warming below 1.5oC. More specifically, … Continue reading
Avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate change
I haven’t really had much to say, hence the lack of posts. I still don’t, but I thought I would quickly highlight a recent paper by Xu and Ramanathan called Well below 2 °C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, Science
Tagged AGW, Catastrophic, Emission reductions, Existential threat, Zero emissions
71 Comments
It’s complicated, and it’s coupled
Matt Ridley, whose writings I’ve discussed before, has a new article in The Times called we are more than a match for hurricanes, that essentially argues that [w]hether or not tropical storms are becoming fiercer, our growing wealth and ingenuity … Continue reading
The Portable POMO
Five paragraphs from Michel Foucault ought to be enough to dig POMO. Let’s take those that start his concluding remarks to the Seminar Discourse and Truth: the Problematization of Parrhesia. Parrhesia refers to the act of speaking candidly: My intention was … Continue reading
Prior knowledge
Something I have been bothered about for some time now, is how we best discuss climate change in the context of extreme events. Given the devastation from Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, damaging floods in South Asia and Nigeria, and the … Continue reading
