Recent Comments
izen on Consensus messaging, an u… ...and Then There's… on A Harde response David B. Benson on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Nathan on Consensus messaging, an u… JCH on Consensus messaging, an u… izen on Consensus messaging, an u… 
Rachel Squirrel- Serving drinks on a train January 16, 2020
- Rabett Run
- HotWhopper
- Willis Eschenbach radiates more nonsense at WUWT January 20, 2020
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- One more data point January 16, 2020
- Stoat
- End of the line for photogenic teens? January 18, 2020
- Open Mind
- -2% of Global Warming Since 1979 Due to “Other Things” January 16, 2020
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Video: Greta Thunberg at Davos January 21, 2020
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS December global up by 0.11°C from November. January 16, 2020
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Erroneous information … was given November 23, 2019
- James’s Empty Blog
- Will the real Chancellor please stand up? January 18, 2020
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- IMSC 2019: The final day June 28, 2019
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- The doctors will see you now… January 21, 2020
Category Archives: Climate change
Consensus messaging, an update
If you’re a regular follower of this blog, you’ll know that some of the most active threads have concerned the scientific consensus about climate change and, more specifically, the issue of consensus messaging. Recently, a new book has been released … Continue reading
Another CMIP6 climate sensitivity constraint
I thought I would follow up yesterday’s post with one that highlights another paper that looks at CMIP6 climate sensitivity. It’s a paper by Femke Nijsse, and colleagues, and considers [a]n emergent constraint on Transient Climate Response from simulated historical … Continue reading
2019: A year in review
The end of another year, so time to do another round-up of this year’s posts. My main impression of 2019, unfortunatey, is that the climate debate is moved from disagreements with people who either deny climate change or the need … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Personal, Scientists, The philosophy of science
Tagged 2019, 2020, Blog review, New Year
27 Comments
Listen to the (political) science
I’ve been meaning to post a review of 2019, but wanted to first comment on something else. I quite often see criticism of how some people approach the issue of climate change. For example, in the Guardian yesterday, there was … Continue reading
Posted in Carbon tax, Climate change, Policy, Politics, Science, Scientists
Tagged Activism, Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti, Climate policy, Greta Thunberg, The Guardian
78 Comments
The never-ending RCP8.5 debate
I think my New Year’s resolution is going to be to not talk about RCP8.5. However, I think I will briefly summarise the state of the never-ending debate. I thought we’d reached a bit of a breakthough when Zeke Hausfather … Continue reading
Different perspectives
I’ve been reflecting a little on some of the recent discussions I’ve had, mostly on Twitter, with those who have more expertise in emission scenarios, and energy systems, than in physical climate science specifically. I’ve found it a somewhat frustrating … Continue reading
Stocks and Flows
Sitting at home waiting for a delivery, so just a quick post. There’s been a new narrative, on social media at least, that we may be heading for a plateau in global emissions. The suggestion, then, is that we are … Continue reading
