-
Recent Posts
- Climate science as a social process February 5, 2023
- The Escalator February 2, 2023
- True Contrarians January 29, 2023
- The Gulf Stream January 22, 2023
- Plausible scenarios January 16, 2023
- Some more about Hansen et al. January 15, 2023
- Hansen’s 10C January 11, 2023
- Approximate net zero January 8, 2023
Recent Comments
russellseitz on Climate science as a social… ...and Then There's… on The Escalator Willard on Climate science as a social… Mark B on The Escalator Mark B on The Escalator Bob Loblaw on Climate science as a social… Bob Loblaw on Climate science as a social… Willard on Climate science as a social… Everett F Sargent on Climate science as a social… Everett F Sargent on Climate science as a social… Archives
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (8)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (6)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (5)
- December 2020 (6)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (8)
- October 2019 (9)
- September 2019 (9)
- August 2019 (8)
- July 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (8)
- April 2019 (8)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (7)
- January 2019 (11)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (9)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (9)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (10)
- November 2017 (9)
- October 2017 (12)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (12)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (11)
- April 2017 (15)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (10)
- January 2017 (14)
- December 2016 (9)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (9)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (12)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (12)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (12)
- January 2016 (18)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (22)
- October 2015 (19)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (14)
- July 2015 (9)
- June 2015 (15)
- May 2015 (17)
- April 2015 (16)
- March 2015 (15)
- February 2015 (15)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (14)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (13)
- August 2014 (20)
- July 2014 (13)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (15)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (19)
- February 2014 (17)
- January 2014 (23)
- December 2013 (23)
- November 2013 (22)
- October 2013 (29)
- September 2013 (27)
- August 2013 (29)
- July 2013 (37)
- June 2013 (34)
- May 2013 (49)
- April 2013 (33)
- advocacy Anthony Watts ClimateBall Climate change Climate sensitivity Comedy ENSO Environmental change ethics Gavin Schmidt Global warming Greenhouse effect IPCC Judith Curry Michael Mann Personal Philosophy for Bloggers physicists Policy Politics Pseudoscience Research Satire Science Scientists Sound Science (tm) The philosophy of science The scientific method Uncategorized Watts Up With That
- Follow …and Then There's Physics on WordPress.com
-
Join 15,955 other subscribers
Top Posts & Pages
Rachel Squirrel
- Peluang Menang Poker Online Yang Efektif December 8, 2022
Rabett Run
- The My Pillowfication of Twitter January 14, 2023
HotWhopper
Variable Variability
- One more reason I dislike linking climate change and extinction August 23, 2022
RealClimate
- 2022 updates to model-observation comparisons February 3, 2023
Open Mind
- A High Schooler’s Take on the Climate Crisis August 5, 2022
Climate denial crock of the week
- Music Break: Bonnie Raitt – Just Like That February 7, 2023
robertscribbler
- O’Neill Psycho Hood Review February 6, 2023
Moyhu
- January global surface TempLS up 0.014°C from December. February 7, 2023
Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
James’s Empty Blog
- No comment necessary November 18, 2022
More than just data
- EGU 2022: Back in person May 29, 2022
Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
Symptons of the Universe
- AI vs A-level January 29, 2023
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsBlogs I Follow
- ...and Then There's Physics
- Neverending Audit
- James' Empty Blog
- Isaac Held's Blog
- izen
- EssaysConcerning
- ClimateBall
- Vitamin CCS
- rachel.blog
- Lawrence Torcello
- Small Epiphanies
- Real Skeptic
- Critical Angle
- Gra Machree
- Open Parachute
- Simple Climate
- Stoat
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Variable Variability
- THE CLIMATE WARS
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- robertscribbler
- Climate Denial Crock of the Week
- DeSmog
- RealClimate
- Idiot Tracker
- Graham Readfearn
- Skepticblog
- What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.
- Rabett Run
- Watching the Deniers
- HotWhopper
- ThinkProgress - Medium
- Skeptical Science
- Wott's Up With That?
- Open Mind
Category Archives: ClimateBall
Plausible scenarios
New Scientist has a recent article about [t]he worst-case climate scenarios are no longer plausible today. This is a topic that has been covered here before, and is partly motivated by a paper discussed in this post. The basic premise … Continue reading
Revkin and Lomborg
I was listening to a podcast hosted by Lex Fridman with guests Andy Revkin and Bjorn Lomborg. The podcast was billed as a Climate Debate, but it wasn’t really. It was mostly two guest who seemed to largely agree with … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, Resilience
Tagged Andy Revkin, Bjorn Lomborg, Lex Fridman, Vulnerabilities
133 Comments
Beyond Catastrophe
Since some commenters on my previous post have mentioned this, I though I might comment on David Wallace-Wells’ recent article in the New York Times. It’s called Beyond Catastrophe, and argues that Thanks to astonishing declines in the price of … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, Roger Pielke Jr
Tagged Catastrophe, David Wallace-Wells, Matt Ridley, New York Times, RCP8.5
149 Comments
Responses to Considering Catastrophe
A while ago I wrote a post about a paper by Luke Kemp, and colleagues, suggesting that we should put more effort into exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. There’s now been a response by Burgess et al. suggesting that Catastrophic … Continue reading
How To Lord Comment Sections
On the 2022-10-03, Christopher Walter Monckton, 3rd Viscount of Brenchley (viz. Christopher) wrote a piece at Tony’s showcasing a paper he allegedly wrote two years ago. Nobody ever read it. It has not been published anywhere. Co-authors are unnamed, yet … Continue reading
No, a cherry-picked analysis doesn’t demonstrate that we’re not in a climate crisis
This is a repost of an article that I wrote for Skeptical Science, with help from @TheDisproof, who has been very active on Twitter debunking various climate myths. A group of Italian scientists recently published a paper in which they … Continue reading
Considering Catastrophe
There’s been quite a lot of recent coverage of a paper suggesting that climate endgames, such as global societal collapse or human extinction, have been dangerously unexplored. For those who recall the contentious RCP8.5 debate, this may seem a surprising … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Gavin Schmidt, Policy, Research, Uncategorized
Tagged Climate endgames, Luke Kemp, RCP8.5, Tim Lenton, worst-case scenarios
92 Comments
FAIL Better
Recently AT reminded us of FLICC, a taxonomy of contrarian tactics introduced in 2007 by MarkH. His bro’s Deck still shines. As a first post of a science blog, it does the job. As a permanent classifier, it deserves some … Continue reading
Posted in ClimateBall, how-to, Pseudoscience, SpeedoScience
Tagged Albert Camus, Don Quixote, John Cook, Mark Hoofnagle, Paul Grice, Samuel Beckett, Skeptical Science
12 Comments
Scenarios
Just before the release of the IPCC’s AR6 WGIII report (Mitigation of Climate Change) Joeri Rogelj had a Carbon Brief guest post on how not to interpret the emission scenarios in the IPCC report. It might have been to try … Continue reading