-
Recent Posts
- How we frame extreme weather events April 1, 2023
- The origins debate March 13, 2023
- Methane, again. March 9, 2023
- Conflicts of Interest March 7, 2023
- Escape from model land February 17, 2023
- The PoNo Principle February 12, 2023
- Climate science as a social process February 5, 2023
- The Escalator February 2, 2023
Recent Comments
Jon Kirwan on The origins debate Susan Anderson on The origins debate smallbluemike on How we frame extreme weather… Everett F Sargent on How we frame extreme weather… Willard on How we frame extreme weather… Willard on How we frame extreme weather… JCH on The origins debate Dave_Geologist on How we frame extreme weather… ...and Then There's… on How we frame extreme weather… ...and Then There's… on How we frame extreme weather… Archives
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (8)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (6)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (5)
- December 2020 (6)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (8)
- October 2019 (9)
- September 2019 (9)
- August 2019 (8)
- July 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (8)
- April 2019 (8)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (7)
- January 2019 (11)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (9)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (9)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (10)
- November 2017 (9)
- October 2017 (12)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (12)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (11)
- April 2017 (15)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (10)
- January 2017 (14)
- December 2016 (9)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (9)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (12)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (12)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (12)
- January 2016 (18)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (22)
- October 2015 (19)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (14)
- July 2015 (9)
- June 2015 (15)
- May 2015 (17)
- April 2015 (16)
- March 2015 (15)
- February 2015 (15)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (14)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (13)
- August 2014 (20)
- July 2014 (13)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (15)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (19)
- February 2014 (17)
- January 2014 (23)
- December 2013 (23)
- November 2013 (22)
- October 2013 (29)
- September 2013 (27)
- August 2013 (29)
- July 2013 (37)
- June 2013 (34)
- May 2013 (49)
- April 2013 (33)
- advocacy Anthony Watts ClimateBall Climate change Climate sensitivity Comedy ENSO Environmental change ethics Gavin Schmidt Global warming Greenhouse effect IPCC Judith Curry Michael Mann Personal Philosophy for Bloggers physicists Policy Politics Pseudoscience Research Satire Science Scientists Sound Science (tm) The philosophy of science The scientific method Uncategorized Watts Up With That
- Follow …and Then There's Physics on WordPress.com
-
Join 15,973 other subscribers
Top Posts & Pages
Rachel Squirrel
- Peluang Menang Poker Online Yang Efektif December 8, 2022
Rabett Run
- What do physicists want? February 15, 2023
HotWhopper
Variable Variability
- One more reason I dislike linking climate change and extinction August 23, 2022
RealClimate
- Unforced Variations: Apr 2023 April 1, 2023
Open Mind
- A High Schooler’s Take on the Climate Crisis August 5, 2022
Climate denial crock of the week
robertscribbler
Moyhu
- CFACT says Net Zero is impossible? Debunked. March 21, 2023
Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
James’s Empty Blog
- No comment necessary November 18, 2022
More than just data
- EGU 2022: Back in person May 29, 2022
Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
Symptons of the Universe
- PhD opening in Nottingham Nanoscience Group: AI & Atoms February 16, 2023
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsBlogs I Follow
- ...and Then There's Physics
- Neverending Audit
- James' Empty Blog
- Isaac Held's Blog
- izen
- EssaysConcerning
- ClimateBall
- Vitamin CCS
- rachel.blog
- Lawrence Torcello
- Small Epiphanies
- Real Skeptic
- Critical Angle
- Gra Machree
- Open Parachute
- Simple Climate
- Stoat
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Variable Variability
- THE CLIMATE WARS
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- robertscribbler
- Climate Denial Crock of the Week
- DeSmog
- RealClimate
- Idiot Tracker
- Graham Readfearn
- Skepticblog
- What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.
- Rabett Run
- Watching the Deniers
- HotWhopper
- ThinkProgress - Medium
- Skeptical Science
- Wott's Up With That?
- Open Mind
Category Archives: Politics
Vulnerability and resilience
I’m starting to better understand why some reasonable people are often concerned about the way in which the impact of extreme weather events are sometimes framed. It’s quite well explained in this recent paper by Myanna Lahsen and Jesse Ribot … Continue reading
Declaring a climate emergency?
Matthew Nisbet, Professor of Communication, Public Policy, and Urban Affairs at Northeastern University, has a new article called Manufacturing Consent: The dangerous campaign behind climate emergency declarations. It makes similar arguments to those made by Mike Hulme in an article … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Philosophy for Bloggers, Policy, Politics, Science, Uncategorized
Tagged Climate emergency, Matthew Nisbet, Mike Hulme, substack
57 Comments
On baselines and climate normals
Mike Hulme, Professor of Human Geography at the University of Cambridge, has a somewhat bizarre article published in Academia Letters called Climates Multiple: Three Baselines, Two Tolerances, One Normal. It’s basically a discussion of the recent World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Philosophy for Bloggers, Politics, Science
Tagged Baselines, Mike Hulme, WMO, World Meteorological Organisation
91 Comments
Policy in the language of science
I was listening to the a Received Wisdom podcast. It’s a podcast by Shobita Parthasarathy and Jack Stilgoe, which I have written about before. At the beginning of the podcast, the hosts were discussing the Great Barrington Declaration, and Jack … Continue reading
Posted in Policy, Politics, Science, Scientists
Tagged Jack Stilgoe, Science and Technology Studies, Shobita Parthasarathy, STS, The Received Wisdom
77 Comments
Across the lines
I haven’t really come across anything to write about recently. I’ve been thinking a bit about models and how they are used to inform decision making. I’ve been thinking a bit about the use of scientific advice. I also had … Continue reading
Posted in advocacy, Personal, Philosophy for Bloggers, Policy, Politics
Tagged Science advice, Tracy Chapman
20 Comments
Attacking scientists who tell the truth?
There’s been some discussion about scientists being attacked for telling the truth. I do, of course, think that this is a real issue, but I also find myself somewhat frustrated by all of this. It’s hardly surprising to anyone who … Continue reading
Posted in Philosophy for Bloggers, Policy, Politics, Scientists
Tagged Politics, Public engagement, Scientific advisers
293 Comments
Sometimes it’s never good enough
I’ve, in the past, suggested that climate scientists could end up being criticised whatever happens. If the impact of climate change ends up being less severe than it could have been, climate scientists will probably be criticised for being alarmists. … Continue reading
A physicist for president?
Jim Al’Khalili has an article in Scientific American called [a] physicist for president? Jim is a physicist, so he’s probably being somewhat provactive. Also, he’s mostly arguing for someone who applies the scientific method to thinking and decision-making and is … Continue reading
Posted in economics, physicists, Politics, Scientists, The scientific method, Uncategorized
Tagged Jim Al-Khalili, physicists, Physics, Political leaders, President, Scientific American, Stoat
51 Comments
Listen to the (political) science
I’ve been meaning to post a review of 2019, but wanted to first comment on something else. I quite often see criticism of how some people approach the issue of climate change. For example, in the Guardian yesterday, there was … Continue reading
Posted in Carbon tax, Climate change, Policy, Politics, Science, Scientists
Tagged Activism, Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti, Climate policy, Greta Thunberg, The Guardian
78 Comments
Societal tipping points
Noami Oreskes and Nicholas Stern have a New York Times Opinion piece called Climate Change will cost us even more than we think. Some are very critical, others are a little more circumspect. I, on the other hand, think that … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, economics, Global warming, Policy, Politics, Severe Events
Tagged Climate damages, Climate policy, Naomi Oreskes, Nicholas Stern, Tipping points
173 Comments