Category Archives: Sound Science ™

Democratising science

I got into a brief discussion on Twitter about democratising science, which some people seemed to think was a good idea. One thing I was trying to do was simply to work out what people meant. I’m still not sure, … Continue reading

Posted in advocacy, Politics, Research, Science, Sound Science (tm), The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , , | 28 Comments

Not even giving physicists a bad name!

When I’m trying to have a bit of a dig at physicists (of which I’m one) who think they somehow know better than climate scientists, I’ll post the cartoon on the right. When I came across this interview with William … Continue reading

Posted in Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, physicists, Science, Sound Science (tm), The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , , , | 68 Comments

Like a Boss

Jim Steele struck again at Judy’s: after walrus science and coral bleaching, he audited Gaia herself. In the walrus episode, I made around 50 comments; Brandon Gates spent 75 in the bleaching one. The Gaia episode features 20 or so, most shorter and … Continue reading

Posted in ClimateBall, Sound Science (tm) | 9 Comments

Our Ethical Web of Beliefs

Last winter, I saw over the tweeter that Lawrence Torcello published a new paper. Paywalled. So I asked him for a copy, using the hashtag #CanIHazPDF: Paywalled, @LTorcello – #canihazpdf please? — willard (@nevaudit) January 24, 2016 He sent me … Continue reading

Posted in ethics, Pseudoscience, Sound Science (tm), The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , | 154 Comments

William Rowan Hamilton

A screaming song is good in case you need to scream. In case you need one to scream at anyone who’d dare to tell you that Science ought to kneel down to the Militaro-Industrial Complex to save itself, here’s one: (Yes, Virginia, … Continue reading

Posted in Sound Science (tm) | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments