Recent Comments
izen on STS: All talk and no walk… izen on STS: All talk and no walk… Ragnaar on STS as science or politic… Steven Mosher on STS: All talk and no walk… Ken Fabian on STS: All talk and no walk… David B. Benson on STS: All talk and no walk… Mal Adapted on STS: All talk and no walk… BBD on STS: All talk and no walk… hypergeometric on STS: All talk and no walk… Steven Mosher on STS: All talk and no walk… 
Rachel Squirrel- Cauliflower cheese without cheese August 19, 2017
- Rabett Run
- Robert Gould Shaw and the Massachusetts 54th Regiment Memorial August 16, 2017
- HotWhopper
- Some photos - snow on Mount Bogong in the Kiewa Valley August 20, 2017
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Data rescue projects August 17, 2017
- Stoat
- Economic denialism? August 10, 2017
- Open Mind
- Ich Bin Schwarz August 14, 2017
- Climate denial crock of the week
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- Temperature averaging and integration - the basics August 17, 2017
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Why We Became Scientists: Dunderhead April 1, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- The Lake Silvaplana papers August 18, 2017
- James’s Empty Blog
- Bishop's Castle Tandem Triathlon July 7, 2017
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- ICON Course 2017 August 14, 2017
- Mallemaroking
- Antarctic sea ice growing season July 28, 2017
Category Archives: Uncategorized
STS: All talk and no walk?
In my previous post I discussed a paper by Harry Collins, and colleagues, that is mainly a response to an editorial by Sergio Sismondo. Collins et al. argue that Science and Technology Studies (STS) must take some responsibility for today’s … Continue reading
STS as science or politics?
I came across a paper by Harry Collins, Robert Evans, and Martin Weinel called STS as science or politics? For those who don’t know, STS stands for Science and Technology Studies and I have written about it before. I haven’t … Continue reading
Manichean paranoia
Some have encouraged me to watch Roger Pielke Jr’s presentation on Climate politics as a manichean paranoia, and I have now done so (slides here, and I’ll post the video at the end of the post.). Manichean paranoia refers to … Continue reading
Proposing A Non-Cynical Red Team Exercise
(Guest posting by Michael Tobis. Opinions expressed here are mt’s only.) Some people who dismiss the climate change issue like to call it “the CAGW hypothesis” for “Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming”. The name is quadruply irritating, inasmuch as 1) a … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
271 Comments
The Only Way Not To Lose Is to Play
In Climateball, the only way to lose is not to play. Consequently the only way not to lose is to play. Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
151 Comments
Hearing about climate science and the scientific method
I’ve been travelling and so haven’t really had much chance to keep up with what’s going on. I have, however, finally managed to watch the Congressional Hearing on Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications and the Scientific Method. It was all … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, Judith Curry, Michael Mann, The philosophy of science, The scientific method, Uncategorized
Tagged climate science, Congressional hearing, Global warming, John Christy, Judith Curry, Lamar Smith, Michael Mann, Roger Pielke Jr
82 Comments
Expose: David Rose does not understand baselines
Never failing to disappoint, David Rose is back with a new expose on how world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data. It refers to a paper published by Karl et al. in 2015 in which … Continue reading
