-
Recent Posts
- The science-society interface May 8, 2022
- The Greenhouse Effect April 20, 2022
- Nine years April 13, 2022
- Scenarios April 9, 2022
- Techniques of climate denial April 3, 2022
- Ignoring the Economists? March 6, 2022
- Moral models February 28, 2022
- A coupled climate-social system February 24, 2022
Recent Comments
Jon Kirwan on The science-society interface Ben McMillan on The science-society interface Jon Kirwan on The science-society interface Thomas Fuller on The science-society interface Dave_Geologist on The science-society interface Thomas Fuller on The science-society interface Dave_Geologist on The science-society interface Dave_Geologist on The science-society interface anoilman on The science-society interface angech on Nine years Archives
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (8)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (6)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (5)
- December 2020 (6)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (8)
- October 2019 (9)
- September 2019 (9)
- August 2019 (8)
- July 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (8)
- April 2019 (8)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (7)
- January 2019 (11)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (9)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (9)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (10)
- November 2017 (9)
- October 2017 (12)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (12)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (11)
- April 2017 (15)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (10)
- January 2017 (14)
- December 2016 (9)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (9)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (12)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (12)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (12)
- January 2016 (18)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (22)
- October 2015 (19)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (14)
- July 2015 (9)
- June 2015 (15)
- May 2015 (17)
- April 2015 (16)
- March 2015 (15)
- February 2015 (15)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (14)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (13)
- August 2014 (20)
- July 2014 (13)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (15)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (19)
- February 2014 (17)
- January 2014 (23)
- December 2013 (23)
- November 2013 (22)
- October 2013 (29)
- September 2013 (27)
- August 2013 (29)
- July 2013 (37)
- June 2013 (34)
- May 2013 (49)
- April 2013 (33)
- advocacy Anthony Watts Carbon tax ClimateBall Climate change Climate sensitivity Comedy ENSO Environmental change ethics Gavin Schmidt Global warming Greenhouse effect IPCC Judith Curry Michael Mann Personal Philosophy for Bloggers Policy Politics Pseudoscience Research Satire Science Scientists Sound Science (tm) The philosophy of science The scientific method Uncategorized Watts Up With That
- Follow …and Then There's Physics on WordPress.com
Top Posts & Pages
Rachel Squirrel
- Hamster escapes! May 15, 2022
Rabett Run
HotWhopper
- Email went down, now it's back August 12, 2021
Variable Variability
RealClimate
- Unforced Variations: May 2022 May 7, 2022
Open Mind
Climate denial crock of the week
- John Oliver on America’s Electric Utilities May 16, 2022
robertscribbler
Moyhu
Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
James’s Empty Blog
- Marmalade Training Camp February 10, 2022
More than just data
- vEGU2021: A “zoom” into science May 1, 2021
Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
Symptons of the Universe
- Songs In The Key of Life February 21, 2022
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsBlogs I Follow
- ...and Then There's Physics
- Neverending Audit
- James' Empty Blog
- Isaac Held's Blog
- izen
- EssaysConcerning
- ClimateBall
- Vitamin CCS
- rachel.blog
- Lawrence Torcello
- Small Epiphanies
- Real Skeptic
- Critical Angle
- Gra Machree
- Open Parachute
- Simple Climate
- Stoat
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Variable Variability
- THE CLIMATE WARS
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- robertscribbler
- Climate Denial Crock of the Week
- DeSmog
- RealClimate
- Idiot Tracker
- Graham Readfearn
- Skepticblog
- What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.
- Rabett Run
- Watching the Deniers
- HotWhopper
- ThinkProgress - Medium
- Skeptical Science
- Wott's Up With That?
- Open Mind
Tag Archives: 97% consensus
Consensus messaging, an update
If you’re a regular follower of this blog, you’ll know that some of the most active threads have concerned the scientific consensus about climate change and, more specifically, the issue of consensus messaging. Recently, a new book has been released … Continue reading
TBH, I don’t really like consensus messaging either
Originally posted on …and Then There's Physics:
I might have to give Dan Kahan some credit. Even though I’m not convinced that consensus messaging is toxic and polarising in general, there are certainly circumstances in which it can be,…
97% vs 99.99%
We’ve just had another consensus paper published. The paper is called Does It Matter if the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Is 97% or 99.99%? (pre-print here). The lead author is Andy Skuce, who has a nice post about it. … Continue reading
Consensus enforcers
I’ve been engaging in some discussions over at cliscep (yes, yes, I know). It included Ben Pile, who seems to think that the phrase is play the man, not the ball. Ben’s mantra appears to be that there is a … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Research, Science, The scientific method
Tagged 97% consensus, cliscep.com, Consensus enforcer, Scientific consensus
97 Comments
Consensus messaging
I haven’t paid much attention to Dan Kahan’s work, but recently noticed a post on his blog about the *public consensus* on what climate scientists think about human-caused global warming. The basic premise seems to be that although your political … Continue reading
Matt Ridley: Lukewarmer
Matt Ridley has a quite remarkable article in the Times called My life as a Lukewarmer (extensive exerts here). I’ve written about Lukewarmers before, but I had not realised – until I read Matt Ridley’s article – how difficult things … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, IPCC, Science
Tagged 97% consensus, Global warming, Lukewarmer, Matt Ridley, The Times
633 Comments
Watt about Monckton and the 97%?
I must admit that the continual attack on the Cook et al. (2013) Consensus paper is all getting a little tedious. I would have thought that people might have moved on by now. Maybe one could aim the same criticism … Continue reading
Posted in Anthony Watts, Christopher Monckton, Climate change, Climate sensitivity, Global warming, Watts Up With That
Tagged 97% consensus, Christopher Monckton, Christopher Monckton 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, Climate change, Consensus, consensus paper, Cook et al., Global warming, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, Legate, Legate et al., Watts Up With That
121 Comments
Watt about the 97% consensus, again?
Watts Up With That (WUWT) has another post about John Cook’s consensus paper. I must admit that I find this all a little odd. In my experience, if people think a paper is ridiculously wrong, they typically just ignore it. … Continue reading
Richard Tol and the 97% consensus
I said in my earlier post that I might write about Richard Tol’s publicly stated views on John Cook’s 97% consensus paper. Since then, however, I’ve had a rather frustrating Twitter discussion with Richard Tol that, sadly, ended quite sourly … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Global warming
Tagged 97% consensus, consensus paper, Cook, Global warming, John Cook, Michael Mann, Richard Tol, Twitter
242 Comments
Richard Tol’s fourth draft
So, Richard Tol has a fourth draft of his climate consensus paper. I don’t really want to say too much more about this as I’ve discussed his draft paper before (here and here). My basic view hasn’t really changed. Richard … Continue reading