Recent Comments
Willard on Cancel culture? Willard on Cancel culture? David B Benson on Cancel culture? Willard on Cancel culture? Joshua on Cancel culture? Willard on Cancel culture? David B Benson on Cancel culture? Joshua on Cancel culture? 
an_older_code on Cancel culture? David B Benson on Cancel culture? 
Rachel Squirrel- Her favourite human July 14, 2020
- Rabett Run
- Germany requiring gas stations to have EV chargers June 6, 2020
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Shellenberger’s op-ad July 9, 2020
- Stoat
- Biden Announces $2 Trillion Climate Plan July 14, 2020
- Open Mind
- Timeline: Trump’s COVID-19 Response July 14, 2020
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Glacier Artist on Time Cover July 14, 2020
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS June global down by 0.11°C from May. July 13, 2020
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Simplistic and Dangerous Models April 20, 2020
- James’s Empty Blog
- Ho hum July 3, 2020
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Digital conferences – how might they work? May 10, 2020
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- Sorry, marketers, but I am not your brand July 6, 2020
Tag Archives: Andrew Dessler
Andrew Dessler rebuts Roy Spencer
Most of the focus at the moment is rightly on the coronavirus. Since I have no relevant expertise whatsoever, all I’ll say is that I hope everyone is doing their best to stay safe, and listening to the advice that’s … Continue reading
Estimates of the economic impact of climate change
I realise Stoat has already covered this, but I thought I would also briefly discuss it here. I posted a couple of tweets, that got quite a lot of responses, about the economic impacts of climate change, that tried to … Continue reading
The ECS is probably above 2K
I have quite a large conference starting tomorrow, so will probably be too busy to write. To keep things ticking over I thought I would post this seminar given by Andrew Dessler, discussing his recent work on constraining the Equilibrium … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, Research
Tagged Andrew Dessler, ECS, Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity
110 Comments
Lewis and Curry, again
I should probably say something about the new Lewis & Curry paper. It’s mostly an update to their earlier paper that I’ve discussed before. Bottom line; there are reasons to be cautious. The basic formalism is that one can use … Continue reading
ECS from a modified energy balance approach
Andrew Dessler’s paper (technically Dessler and Forster), which he mentioned in this comment, has now appeared as a pre-print. Essentially, they use an energy balance approach to estimate equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), but – as I mentioned in this post … Continue reading
Narrowing the climate sensitivity range?
There have been a couple of recent papers presenting analyses that claim to have narrowed the likely range for equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). One is Dessler et al. (currently a discussion paper under review) which suggests that the 500hPa tropical … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, Policy, Research, Science
Tagged Andrew Dessler, Carbon budgets, ECS, Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity, Peter Cox
151 Comments
More about Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity
It’s currently the AGU Fall Meeting and there was a session on Climate sensitivity and feedbacks. It included talks by Kate Marvel and Kyle Armour, and I noticed that the Convener, Andrew Dessler, had tweeted This leads to one of … Continue reading
A bit more about clouds
A few years ago I posted a video by Andrew Dessler that was discussing whether or not Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity could be less than 3oC. The bottom line was that the best estimate for ECS is about 3oC. Given that … Continue reading
The enhanced greenhouse effect
This is really just an opportunity to write a little bit about science, and to advertise other people’s work. There are some who suggest that adding CO2 to the atmosphere can’t lead to warming because CO2 absorption is saturated. This … Continue reading
ECS ~1K?????
There is a new paper that is being somewhat uncritically accepted at the new Climate “Skepticism” site (and, yes, the inverted commas are necessary) and at Bishop Hill. It’s by someone called J. Ray Bates and claims to estimate climate … Continue reading
