Recent Comments
Rachel Squirrel- This is why we don’t go to Hazlehead Park April 17, 2021
- Rabett Run
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Stoat
- Equity Isn’t Just Ethical, It’s Stupid April 11, 2021
- Open Mind
- COVID-19: Failure July 23, 2020
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Watch This April 18, 2021
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS March global up by 0.22°C from February. April 13, 2021
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Reproducibility of high resolution reconstruction – one year on October 11, 2020
- James’s Empty Blog
- Speed vs power in Zwift April 14, 2021
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Digital conferences – how might they work? May 10, 2020
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- Reblog: Unintentional entertainment in science writing April 14, 2021
Tag Archives: Carbon dioxide
Guest post: Nothing New Under the Sun
This is a guest post from John Russell. I won’t describe what it says as it speaks for itself, but it is quite remarkable that our basic understanding of how CO2 will influence our climate has changed little in the … Continue reading
Is the GWPF avin’ a larf?
I know I should really ignore these things, but not only is the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) taken seriously by some, my incredulity also tends to win out. The latest in my they can’t really have said that, can … Continue reading
Forcings and feedbacks
William Connolley had a recent post about making stuff up, that discussed the linear relationship between temperature change and change in forcing (ΔT = λΔF). I commented that I had thought that this linear relationship was simply an approximation based … Continue reading
Watt about the CO2 residence time?
Watts Up With That (WUWT) has a recent post by Christopher Monckton called On CO2 residence times – the chicken or the egg. Ths post discusses the bombtest curve shown in the figure below. This curve shows the decay of … Continue reading
Posted in Anthony Watts, Christopher Monckton, Climate change, Global warming, IPCC, Watts Up With That
Tagged anthropogenic CO2, Bombtest, Carbon dioxide, Christopher Monckton, Christopher Monckton 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, Climate change, Gosta Petterson, Gostas Petterson, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Residence time, Richard Lindzen
25 Comments
Salby comment 1
Murry Salby has now completed his tour of Britain and there have been a few posts discussing his presentations. Some positive, others not. I’ll be quite honest and say that I think Salby’s ideas are scientifically incorrect and that it’s … Continue reading
Watt about the 100:1?
I really thought that maybe Watts Up With That (WUWT) was keeping quiet about Topher Field’s 50-to-1 video project because they’d realised just how silly the actual calculation was. Oh, how wrong I was. There is now a new post … Continue reading
Watt about a science-based rebuttal to global warming alarmism?
There’s a new post on Watts Up With That (WUWT) that claims to be a a science-based rebuttal to global warming alarmism (in fact, it is essentially a cut and paste from an article in the Washington Times). It’s by … Continue reading
Watt about doing revolutionary science?
Watts Up With That (WUWT) has new post called can the IPCC do revolutionary science? The post suggests that the But the SPM has been sidelined by momentous climate change events that occurred after its March cut-off date – and … Continue reading
Watt about the Magellan telescope?
Watts Up With That (WUWT) has a recent post called new telescope brings the power of Hubble down to Earth. It’s really a press release from the University of Arizona about recent results using the new MagAO system on the … Continue reading
Watt about the 95% certainty?
It has been suggested that the forthcoming IPCC AR5 report will claim that it is at least 95% percent likely that human activities – chiefly the burning of fossil fuels – are the main cause of warming since the 1950. … Continue reading
