-
Recent Posts
- ‘Net zero’ March 3, 2021
- Losing the sky February 26, 2021
- Agricultural emissions February 7, 2021
- Deferential? February 3, 2021
- Anti-Virus January 30, 2021
- Alan’s Bottle January 23, 2021
- On baselines and climate normals January 17, 2021
- Warming commitments January 8, 2021
Recent Comments
David B Benson on ‘Net zero’ In realtà l'AMO… on David Rose on Judith Curry… ...and Then There's… on ‘Net zero’ angech on ‘Net zero’ ...and Then There's… on ‘Net zero’ I. J. Khanewala on ‘Net zero’ smallbluemike on ‘Net zero’ smallbluemike on ‘Net zero’ ‘Net zero… on Warming commitments David B Benson on Agricultural emissions Archives
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (5)
- December 2020 (6)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (8)
- October 2019 (9)
- September 2019 (9)
- August 2019 (8)
- July 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (8)
- April 2019 (8)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (7)
- January 2019 (11)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (9)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (9)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (10)
- November 2017 (9)
- October 2017 (12)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (12)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (11)
- April 2017 (15)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (10)
- January 2017 (14)
- December 2016 (9)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (9)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (12)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (12)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (12)
- January 2016 (18)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (22)
- October 2015 (19)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (14)
- July 2015 (9)
- June 2015 (15)
- May 2015 (17)
- April 2015 (16)
- March 2015 (15)
- February 2015 (15)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (14)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (13)
- August 2014 (20)
- July 2014 (13)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (15)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (19)
- February 2014 (17)
- January 2014 (23)
- December 2013 (23)
- November 2013 (22)
- October 2013 (29)
- September 2013 (27)
- August 2013 (29)
- July 2013 (37)
- June 2013 (34)
- May 2013 (49)
- April 2013 (33)
- advocacy Anthony Watts Carbon tax ClimateBall Climate change Climate sensitivity Comedy ENSO Environmental change ethics Gavin Schmidt Global warming Greenhouse effect IPCC Judith Curry Michael Mann Personal Philosophy for Bloggers Policy Politics Pseudoscience Research Satire Science Scientists Sound Science (tm) The philosophy of science The scientific method Uncategorized Watts Up With That
- Follow …and Then There's Physics on WordPress.com
Top Posts & Pages
- 'Net zero'
- Cancel culture?
- Losing the sky
- Guest post : Label the behaviour, not the person
- Infrared absorption of atmospheric carbon dioxide
- Effective emission height
- The Mysterious Wildfire Chart
- Arguing about the greenhouse effect - again
- "very likely" versus "extremely likely"
- You only need about 60 surface stations
Rachel Squirrel
Rabett Run
- Banning new gas stations March 3, 2021
HotWhopper
Variable Variability
RealClimate
Stoat
- Shamima Begum cannot return to UK, Supreme Court rules February 26, 2021
Open Mind
- COVID-19: Failure July 23, 2020
Climate denial crock of the week
- In Chinese Desert, Solar Park is an Oasis March 5, 2021
robertscribbler
Moyhu
uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Reproducibility of high resolution reconstruction – one year on October 11, 2020
James’s Empty Blog
- BlueSkiesResearch.org.uk: Escape velocity March 1, 2021
Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
More than just data
- Digital conferences – how might they work? May 10, 2020
Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
Symptons of the Universe
- Primal Beat Therapy February 13, 2021
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsBlogs I Follow
- ...and Then There's Physics
- Neverending Audit
- James' Empty Blog
- Isaac Held's Blog
- izen
- EssaysConcerning
- ClimateBall
- Vitamin CCS
- Rachel
- Lawrence Torcello
- Small Epiphanies
- Real Skeptic
- Critical Angle
- Gra Machree
- Open Parachute
- Simple Climate
- Stoat
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Variable Variability
- THE CLIMATE WARS
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- robertscribbler
- Climate Denial Crock of the Week
- DeSmogBlog
- RealClimate
- Idiot Tracker
- Graham Readfearn
- Skepticblog
- What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.
- Rabett Run
- Watching the Deniers
- HotWhopper
- ThinkProgress - Medium
- Skeptical Science
- Wott's Up With That?
- Open Mind
Tag Archives: Climate debate
Depolarising the debate?
I’ve always been a little puzzled by the (mostly) social scientists who seem to argue that to develop effective climate policy we should stop using labels, be depolarizing the debate, and should prioritise civil disagreements. It’s not that I object … Continue reading
Civility
A recent discussion has led me to think a bit more about civility. This was partly motivated by my own intention to maintain it when I started this blog (which didn’t always succeed) and by the other party being someone … Continue reading
Manichean paranoia
Some have encouraged me to watch Roger Pielke Jr’s presentation on Climate politics as a manichean paranoia, and I have now done so (slides here, and I’ll post the video at the end of the post.). Manichean paranoia refers to … Continue reading
The middle ground
Matt Ridley has been complaining about the frantic polarising on Twitter since his talk. When it was pointed out that frantic polarising is a euphemism for ‘lots of people disagree with my argument’, he responded with no it’s not. I … Continue reading
Another 97%
In a previous post I mentioned that Richard Tol had published a paper on the structure of the climate debate. As I said in that post, the paper appears to be trying to portray the author as part of some … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Satire, Science
Tagged 97%, Climate blogs, Climate debate, Climate denialism, Climate Skepticism, cliscep, Richard Tol
44 Comments
The Royal Society and the GWPF
A couple of weeks ago, it came out that the Royal Society had hired space for an event being run by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF). The event turns out to be a lecture by Matt Ridley, who I … Continue reading
Climateball(TM): re-energised
Apart from writing some blog posts here (and thanks to MT and others, I’ve had to write fewer than normal) I’ve largely been staying out of the whole online climate debate; ignoring the ClimateballTM mantra that the only losing move … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, Michael Mann, Science
Tagged Climate debate, Climate Scepticism, Climate Wars, Climateball(TM), Michael Mann
67 Comments
I’m back…sort of
I’m back from my conference, and – I have to say – I thoroughly enjoyed being away, not blogging and not Twittering (well, not much). One problem is that I enjoyed it so much, I really want to try and … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, Personal, Science
Tagged Climate debate, Conference, Online climate debate, Serious
125 Comments
Polemics
I stayed up last night and watched the South Africa – New Zealand semi-final at the cricket world cup. I really shouldn’t have, as I really am now too old to do an all-nighter, and we lost. However, I also … Continue reading
Posted in ClimateBall, Science
Tagged Climate debate, Cricket world cup, Discussions, Michel Foucault, Online climate debate, Polemics
86 Comments
Just some things
I haven’t written anything for a while. Partly I’ve been rather busy with other things, and partly I’m just going through another phase of just wondering about what the whole point is. The whole climate debate seems so polarised, that … Continue reading