-
Recent Posts
- How we frame extreme weather events April 1, 2023
- The origins debate March 13, 2023
- Methane, again. March 9, 2023
- Conflicts of Interest March 7, 2023
- Escape from model land February 17, 2023
- The PoNo Principle February 12, 2023
- Climate science as a social process February 5, 2023
- The Escalator February 2, 2023
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (8)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (6)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (5)
- December 2020 (6)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (8)
- October 2019 (9)
- September 2019 (9)
- August 2019 (8)
- July 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (8)
- April 2019 (8)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (7)
- January 2019 (11)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (9)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (9)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (10)
- November 2017 (9)
- October 2017 (12)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (12)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (11)
- April 2017 (15)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (10)
- January 2017 (14)
- December 2016 (9)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (9)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (12)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (12)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (12)
- January 2016 (18)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (22)
- October 2015 (19)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (14)
- July 2015 (9)
- June 2015 (15)
- May 2015 (17)
- April 2015 (16)
- March 2015 (15)
- February 2015 (15)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (14)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (13)
- August 2014 (20)
- July 2014 (13)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (15)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (19)
- February 2014 (17)
- January 2014 (23)
- December 2013 (23)
- November 2013 (22)
- October 2013 (29)
- September 2013 (27)
- August 2013 (29)
- July 2013 (37)
- June 2013 (34)
- May 2013 (49)
- April 2013 (33)
- advocacy Anthony Watts ClimateBall Climate change Climate sensitivity Comedy ENSO Environmental change ethics Gavin Schmidt Global warming Greenhouse effect IPCC Judith Curry Michael Mann Personal Philosophy for Bloggers physicists Policy Politics Pseudoscience Research Satire Science Scientists Sound Science (tm) The philosophy of science The scientific method Uncategorized Watts Up With That
- Follow …and Then There's Physics on WordPress.com
-
Join 15,973 other subscribers
Top Posts & Pages
Rachel Squirrel
- Peluang Menang Poker Online Yang Efektif December 8, 2022
Rabett Run
- What do physicists want? February 15, 2023
HotWhopper
Variable Variability
- One more reason I dislike linking climate change and extinction August 23, 2022
RealClimate
- Unforced Variations: Apr 2023 April 1, 2023
Open Mind
- A High Schooler’s Take on the Climate Crisis August 5, 2022
Climate denial crock of the week
robertscribbler
Moyhu
- CFACT says Net Zero is impossible? Debunked. March 21, 2023
Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
James’s Empty Blog
- No comment necessary November 18, 2022
More than just data
- EGU 2022: Back in person May 29, 2022
Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
Symptons of the Universe
- PhD opening in Nottingham Nanoscience Group: AI & Atoms February 16, 2023
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsBlogs I Follow
- ...and Then There's Physics
- Neverending Audit
- James' Empty Blog
- Isaac Held's Blog
- izen
- EssaysConcerning
- ClimateBall
- Vitamin CCS
- rachel.blog
- Lawrence Torcello
- Small Epiphanies
- Real Skeptic
- Critical Angle
- Gra Machree
- Open Parachute
- Simple Climate
- Stoat
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Variable Variability
- THE CLIMATE WARS
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- robertscribbler
- Climate Denial Crock of the Week
- DeSmog
- RealClimate
- Idiot Tracker
- Graham Readfearn
- Skepticblog
- What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.
- Rabett Run
- Watching the Deniers
- HotWhopper
- ThinkProgress - Medium
- Skeptical Science
- Wott's Up With That?
- Open Mind
Tag Archives: Consensus
Say it again, and again, and again, and again …..
Since I’ve been focusing a bit recently on science communication I thought I would briefly discuss a paper by Simon Donner called Publish or perish: finding the balance in science communication. The reason for my title is that he suggests … Continue reading
97% vs 99.99%
We’ve just had another consensus paper published. The paper is called Does It Matter if the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Is 97% or 99.99%? (pre-print here). The lead author is Andy Skuce, who has a nice post about it. … Continue reading
Red Team vs Blue Team
Having some kind of Red Team exercise, to test and challenge the climate science consensus, seems to be gaining a small amount of momentum. Steve Koonin (who I have discussed before) has an article in the Wall Street Journal called … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Gavin Schmidt, Judith Curry, Research, Science, The scientific method
Tagged Blue Team, Climate etc., Consensus, Eli, Red Team, Steve Koonin, Stoat, Wall Street Journal
113 Comments
Intellectual monocultures
I came across an article that I’ve been thinking about for a few days. I thought I would simply post some thoughts. They may not be well-formed, and my views could certainly change. I should say that I got it … Continue reading
On Bullshit!
Apologies to my more sensitive readers, but I thought I would post this short video by Harry Frankfurt, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Princeton University. I believe that the origin of this is quite old, but – given that he … Continue reading
Consensus messaging – again
I’ve written before about my views with respect to consensus messaging. It seems to be a topic that divides opinion, but there was a recent paper suggesting that perceived scientific agreement is an important gateway belief, ultimately influencing public responses … Continue reading
Posted in ClimateBall, Comedy, Global warming
Tagged 97%, AGW, Consensus, Consensus messaging, Dan Kahan, Lawrence Torcello
204 Comments
We can never “know” anything
Judith Curry has waded into the consensus discussion by highlighting a post written by two people I’ve never heard of and – from what I can find – have no actual expertise in this topic whatsoever. Apparently the key point … Continue reading
Persistence!
Richard Tol has another article about how claims of a scientific consensus don’t stand up (you can read it here if you really want to). It’s the standard message that he’s been promoting for quite some time now and I … Continue reading
Posted in ClimateBall, Global warming, Satire
Tagged Consensus, Richard Tol, Scientific consensus, TCP, The Australian, The Consensus Project
578 Comments
Peter Doran on the 97%.
Since I haven’t written about the 97% for some time, I thought I would post this video of Peter Doran’s TEDx talk about Bringing opinions on climate change closer to reality. There are a couple of things I found interesting … Continue reading
The best evidence we have!
Brian Cox took a bit of flack because of a Guardian article about a speech he’d given in which he appeared to be suggesting that – when discussing climate science – scientists should sound more certain than they are. I … Continue reading
Posted in advocacy, Climate change, Global warming, IPCC, Science
Tagged Andrew Montford, Brian Cox, Climate change, climate science, Consensus, consensus position, Global warming, Guardian
45 Comments