Tag Archives: Gavin Schmidt

No, Hansen wasn’t wrong!

It’s 30 years since James Hansen testified before the US Congress about climate change. In the same year, he published a paper that produced some forecasts. I wasn’t going to write about this as there are a number of articles … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 214 Comments

The climate of the past

Richard Alley and Gavin Schmidt, currently two of the best climate communicators, recently gave presentations at the Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, about how we study paleoclimate and how this understanding can help us to project what will … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, economics, Research, Scientists, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , , | 181 Comments

A Harde response

Earlier this year, I wrote a post about a paper by Hermann Harde that argued that most of the rise in atmospheric CO2 was natural. If you want more details of why this suggestion is nonsense, you can read my … Continue reading

Posted in ClimateBall, Gavin Schmidt, Research, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | 38 Comments

Climate model tuning

I wrote a post about model tuning that discussed a paper that argued for more transparency in how climate models are tuned. Gavin Schmidt, and colleagues, have now published a paper that discusses the Practice and philosophy of climate model … Continue reading

Posted in Climate sensitivity, Gavin Schmidt, Research, Science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , , | 62 Comments

Scientists are not salespeople!

Gavin Schmidt posted a bunch of tweets in response to a post by Scott Adams (of Dilbert fame) in which he claims to illustrate how climate scientists can persuade skeptics. If you want to read Gavin’s tweets, Greg Laden has … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Research, Science, The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , | 52 Comments

Advocacy and scientific credibility

To the surprise of few, I suspect, it appears that scientists can advocate without damaging their, or the scientific community’s, credibility. It’s reported in this paper, [d]oes Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? and is discussed in this … Continue reading

Posted in advocacy, ethics, Policy, Politics, Research, Science, The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , | 56 Comments

Oh no, not again

Somehow a paper arguing that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is mostly natural has managed to pass peer-review. Gavin Schmidt’s already covered it in a Realcimate post. Gavin Cawley’s paper is, in a sense, a pre-emptive response to this new … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, IPCC, Pseudoscience, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | 69 Comments