Recent Comments
Steven Mosher on Depolarising the debate? ecoquant on Depolarising the debate? Steven Mosher on Depolarising the debate? ecoquant on Depolarising the debate? Steven Mosher on Depolarising the debate? smallbluemike on Depolarising the debate? ecoquant on Depolarising the debate? John Shewchuk on Physics smallbluemike on Depolarising the debate? ecoquant on Depolarising the debate? 
Rachel Squirrel- The Queen’s Circular walk, Braemar November 10, 2019
- Rabett Run
- Some notes on Economic Policy Innovations to Combat Climate Change November 10, 2019
- HotWhopper
- Climate scientists - respect, but don't be afraid of policy November 8, 2019
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Sensitive But Unclassified November 6, 2019
- Stoat
- How Scientists Got Climate Change So Wrong? November 10, 2019
- Open Mind
- Global Temperature Update November 8, 2019
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Yes, Hurricanes are Getting Stronger November 12, 2019
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Making a pollen diagram from Neotoma October 10, 2019
- James’s Empty Blog
- BlueSkiesResearch.org.uk: Mina olen Eesti e-resident! 🇪🇪 November 11, 2019
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- IMSC 2019: The final day June 28, 2019
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- What Is “University”? November 4, 2019
Tag Archives: Greenhouse effect
A little knowledge
There is apparently a paper from a couple of years ago that is currently doing the rounds and that argues that the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law Points to a Very Low Climate Sensitivity. The suggestion is … Continue reading
Arguing about the greenhouse effect – again
There’s been a rather lengthy Twitter thread about the greenhouse effect. In particular, focusing on claims that there is no such thing. Of course, engaging in such discussions so as to actually change anyone’s minds is pointless. However, I think … Continue reading
The Virial Theorem
I had another brief Twitter discussion with Ned Nikolov, whose paper I discussed in this post. Ned seems to think that there is no atmospheric greenhouse effect and that the enhanced surface temperature is due to atmospheric pressure somehow enhancing … Continue reading
The enhanced greenhouse effect
This is really just an opportunity to write a little bit about science, and to advertise other people’s work. There are some who suggest that adding CO2 to the atmosphere can’t lead to warming because CO2 absorption is saturated. This … Continue reading
Seems OMICS International will publish anything
A new paper in the Environment Pollution and Climate Change journal (published by OMICS International) claims to have provided a refutation of the climate greenhouse theory. It’s, of course, utter nonsense, so I’m not planning on saying much. What is … Continue reading
The Greenhouse effect: an illustration
I thought I would quickly highlight this Realclimate post which is intended to be the best description of the Greenhouse effect. It’s written by Ramus Benestad, the author of this paper. The main reason I wanted to highlight it was … Continue reading
Guest post: Nothing New Under the Sun
This is a guest post from John Russell. I won’t describe what it says as it speaks for itself, but it is quite remarkable that our basic understanding of how CO2 will influence our climate has changed little in the … Continue reading
