Recent Comments
verytallguy on Doomsday scenarios Steven Mosher on Doomsday scenarios Steven Mosher on Doomsday scenarios hypergeometric on Doomsday scenarios hypergeometric on Doomsday scenarios Ragnaar on Doomsday scenarios Mal Adapted on Doomsday scenarios Mal Adapted on Doomsday scenarios Bob Loblaw on Doomsday scenarios Mal Adapted on Doomsday scenarios 
Rachel Squirrel- WordCamp Edinburgh 2017 July 24, 2017
- Rabett Run
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- Is nitpicking a climate doomsday warning allowed? July 23, 2017
- RealClimate
- Joy plots for climate change July 22, 2017
- Stoat
- The management apologise for more inconvenience July 16, 2017
- Open Mind
- Does Willis Eschenbach have Any Honor? July 22, 2017
- Climate denial crock of the week
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- NOAA's new ERSST V5 Sea surface temperature and TempLS July 21, 2017
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Why We Became Scientists: Dunderhead April 1, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- All the pollen July 22, 2017
- James’s Empty Blog
- Bishop's Castle Tandem Triathlon July 7, 2017
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Mallemaroking
- The bathymetry in front of iceberg A68 July 18, 2017
Tag Archives: James Hansen
Not even giving physicists a bad name!
When I’m trying to have a bit of a dig at physicists (of which I’m one) who think they somehow know better than climate scientists, I’ll post the cartoon on the right. When I came across this interview with William … Continue reading
The TCR-to-ECS ratio
Something I’ve been interested in is whether or not the ratio between the Transient Climate Response (TCR) and the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) best estimates from most of Nic Lewis’s work makes sense. Typically his TCR best estimate is around … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, Science
Tagged Climate sensitivity, ECS, Energy balance models, James Hansen, Nic Lewis, TCR, TCRE
76 Comments
Reblog: On Hansen et al.
I haven’t really had a chance to properly read the new Hansen et al. paper (apart from the reviewers, who does?). However, it is clearly a paper that has already had impact and somewhat divided opinions, so I asked Peter … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, Science
Tagged ICARUS, James Hansen, Peer-review, Peter Thorne, sea level rise
179 Comments
Extreme events
I had thought of writing about Hansen’s recent paper, but I’m not really sure what to say about it. I did read some of the reviews – Thorne, Archer, Ruddiman – and, unsurprisingly, there appear to be some valid criticisms. … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, IPCC
Tagged Climate denial, Extreme events, James Hansen, Michael Kelly
104 Comments
Over-reaction?
There was a fun press release from the University of Bristol about using a Global Circulation Model (GCM) to study the climate of Tolkien’s Middle Earth. A number of people on Twitter (Richard Betts, Gavin Schmidt, Doug MacNeall) seemed to … Continue reading
And then there’s the energy imbalance
There are a few things I have been considering writing about, but since I’ve renamed the blog to be more explicitly physics orientated, I thought the first should at least reflect that change. There’s a recent paper by James Hansen … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Global warming, Judith Curry, Science
Tagged AGW, Climate change, Energy imbalance, Global warming, James Hansen, Physics, Radiative forcing, Stadium wave
29 Comments
An acknowledgement, but not really a correction
A few days ago I wrote a post (what matters is the radiative imbalance) in which I claimed that a post by David Stockwell was wrong. David made a few comments on my post, claiming that I had made a … Continue reading
