Recent Comments
David B. Benson on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Max Polo on A Harde response Nathan on Consensus messaging, an u… JCH on Consensus messaging, an u… izen on Consensus messaging, an u… Jon Kirwan on Consensus messaging, an u… lerpo on Consensus messaging, an u… 
Rachel Squirrel- Serving drinks on a train January 16, 2020
- Rabett Run
- HotWhopper
- Willis Eschenbach radiates more nonsense at WUWT January 20, 2020
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- One more data point January 16, 2020
- Stoat
- End of the line for photogenic teens? January 18, 2020
- Open Mind
- -2% of Global Warming Since 1979 Due to “Other Things” January 16, 2020
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Video: Greta Thunberg at Davos January 21, 2020
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS December global up by 0.11°C from November. January 16, 2020
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Erroneous information … was given November 23, 2019
- James’s Empty Blog
- Will the real Chancellor please stand up? January 18, 2020
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- IMSC 2019: The final day June 28, 2019
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- The doctors will see you now… January 21, 2020
Tag Archives: Negative emissions
Rethinking climate policy
Roger Pielke Jr has been promoting his new paper in Issues in Science and Technology. The paper is called opening up the climate policy envelope and Roger has been suggesting that people should read it. I’ve read it a couple … Continue reading
Posted in advocacy, Carbon tax, IPCC, Policy, Roger Pielke Jr
Tagged BECCS, Climate policy, IAMs, Issues in Science and Technology, Negative emissions
290 Comments
Carbon Dioxide Removal
There’s a bit of a debate going on a about economics and ethics, mostly on MT’s blog, but also on Stoat, and a little bit here. I have to be honest, I’m not entirely sure what people are actually disagreeing … Continue reading
Kevin Anderson: how numbers reveal another reality
I’ve finally watched the video of Kevin Anderson’s talk (posted in a comment that I currently can’t find) which was part of the Cambridge Climate Lecture Series. I found it quite uncomfortable. He addressed things that we typically avoid. The … Continue reading
Posted in advocacy, Climate change, Policy, Politics, Research, Scientists
Tagged CCLS, Climate change, Climate policy, IAMs, Kevin Anderson, Negative emissions
121 Comments
Negative emissions
I went to some Departmental talks recently and discovered that some of my colleagues are researchering possible carbon sequestration technologies. This could be very important, but appealing to negative emission technologies is often quite strongly criticised. The basic argument (which … Continue reading
Emission reductions, negative emissions, and overshoots
I was wanting to briefly discuss a paper I ran across that looks at What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? The basic idea is to develop emission pathways that depend on three basic parameters; the time … Continue reading
Misrepresented?
Oliver Geden has suggested that I misrepresented him in my earlier post. Rather than explaining why, he tweeted one his papers and suggested I should read it, rather than base my views on short quotations. Well, I have, and still … Continue reading
