Recent Comments
Rachel Squirrel- Peluang Menang Poker Online Yang Efektif December 8, 2022
- Rabett Run
- What do physicists want? February 15, 2023
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- One more reason I dislike linking climate change and extinction August 23, 2022
- RealClimate
- Some new CMIP6 MSU comparisons March 16, 2023
- Open Mind
- A High Schooler’s Take on the Climate Crisis August 5, 2022
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Climate Anxiety Widespread Among Young People April 1, 2023
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- CFACT says Net Zero is impossible? Debunked. March 21, 2023
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
- James’s Empty Blog
- No comment necessary November 18, 2022
- More than just data
- EGU 2022: Back in person May 29, 2022
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- PhD opening in Nottingham Nanoscience Group: AI & Atoms February 16, 2023
Tag Archives: Pseudoscience
No, pressure alone does not define surface temperatures!
Eli’s already covered this but I thought I would present a slightly different argument. The topic is a recent paper by Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller called new insights on the physical nature of the atmospheric greenhouse effect deduced from … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Greenhouse effect, Research, Science
Tagged Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect, Karl Zeller, Ned Nikolov, OMICS, Pseudoscience
135 Comments
...and Then There's Physics 