Tag Archives: Science and Technology Studies

Democratising science

I got into a brief discussion on Twitter about democratising science, which some people seemed to think was a good idea. One thing I was trying to do was simply to work out what people meant. I’m still not sure, … Continue reading

Posted in advocacy, Politics, Research, Science, Sound Science (tm), The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , , | 68 Comments

Why should anyone care?

Steve Fuller, who is a sociologist at the University of Warwick, recently wrote an article in the Guardian called Science has always been a bit post-truth. I thought it was confused. Others were somewhat blunter I have rarely read a … Continue reading

Posted in Research, Science, The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , , | 207 Comments

Saving science?

After my discussion about Reiner Grundmann’s Nature Comment, someone made me aware of an article called saving science. It’s rather long and has already been described as the the largest (and most verbose) strawman ever. His basic argument seems to … Continue reading

Posted in Research, Science, The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , | 90 Comments

The value of social science

Since I’ve written about Science and Technology Studies (STS) before, I thought I would comment on the formation of a new group called Association for Studies in Innovation Science and Technology. I encountered it in a Nature column called Recognise … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Global warming, Science | Tagged , , , | 183 Comments

On transparency

A while ago I wrote a post about a Nature commentary on Research Integrity and transparency, by Stephan Lewandowsky and Dorothy Bishop. Warren Pearce and colleagues wrote a brief response and have since expanded on this in a blog post. … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, Science, Universities | Tagged , , , , , , | 44 Comments

Guest post: Can we end the antagonistic ‘climate debate’?

This is a guest post by Richard Erskine, who is a regular commenter here and also writes EssaysConcerning. As should be clear, it’s a comment on a recent paper by Amelia Sharman and Candice Howarth that considers why climate scientists … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Gavin Schmidt, Global warming, IPCC | Tagged , , , , , , , | 110 Comments

Guest post: Invitation to participate in a PhD research project on climate blogging

This is a follow-up guest post, by a PhD student who is looking for people who comment at, or read, scientist-produced climate blogs, to volunteer to be interviewed as part of his research project. He is also interviewing those who … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Global warming, Science | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments