Recent Comments
Peter D Grimshaw on Effective emission height ...and Then There's… on Effective emission height Peter D Grimshaw on Effective emission height rustneversleeps on The effect of permafrost on th… Ben McMillan on The effect of permafrost on th… rustneversleeps on The effect of permafrost on th… smallbluemike on The effect of permafrost on th… Willard on The effect of permafrost on th… smallbluemike on The effect of permafrost on th… Ben McMillan on The effect of permafrost on th… 
Rachel Squirrel- Cat in a backpack September 24, 2021
- Rabett Run
- Unclear on Afghanistan September 7, 2021
- HotWhopper
- Email went down, now it's back August 12, 2021
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- The definitive CO2/CH4 comparison post September 20, 2021
- Stoat
- Leaving Afghanistan September 24, 2021
- Open Mind
- Please Vaccinate against COVID-19 September 8, 2021
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Drought Smacked Lake Mead Could Become “Dead Pool” September 24, 2021
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- Moyhu hiatus July 14, 2021
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
- James’s Empty Blog
- Speed vs power in Zwift April 14, 2021
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- vEGU2021: A “zoom” into science May 1, 2021
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- Intramolecular water divining September 22, 2021
Tag Archives: Scientists
The adults in the room
I was having another discussion on Twitter with Jean Goodwin, who posted the following quote. It’s attributed to Mark Largent and may have been delivered at a AAAS meeting. I’m interested in what other people think of this. I don’t … Continue reading
Posted in ethics, Science, Scientists, The philosophy of science, The scientific method
Tagged AAAS, History of Science, Jean Goodwin, Mark Largent, Scientists
177 Comments
If someone says “deficit model thinking” again I’ll…..
There can be a tendency, often amongst social scientists, to accuse scientists of deficit model thinking. The suggestion is that there are scientists who think hostility to science, or a lack of trust in science, is because of a lack … Continue reading
Marches for Science
Tomorrow is the day of Marches for Science. The idea of a march for science has somewhat divided people, although along rather predictable lines. There’s concern that it will be seen as politicising science. There’s concern that it will be … Continue reading
Posted in Personal, Politics, Research, Science, The scientific method
Tagged Informed, March for Science, Politics, Scientists
46 Comments
Advocacy and scientific credibility
To the surprise of few, I suspect, it appears that scientists can advocate without damaging their, or the scientific community’s, credibility. It’s reported in this paper, [d]oes Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? and is discussed in this … Continue reading
Science communication
I came across a Guardian article called why scientists are losing the fight to communicate science to the public. The only polite way I can describe it is missing the point entirely. The article was motivated by Brian Cox’s appearance … Continue reading
Posted in Personal, Research, Science
Tagged Brian Cox, Guardian, Richard P Grant, Science communication, Scientists
83 Comments
The Scientific Method
I was going to use a New York Times article about the Scientific Method, that Susan highlighted, to say something about the scientific method. From what I’ve seen, the response to the article has been mixed, but I’m going to … Continue reading
