Recent Comments
Ben McMillan on Plausible emission scenarios Chubbs on Plausible emission scenarios paulski0 on Plausible emission scenarios Ben McMillan on Plausible emission scenarios paulski0 on Plausible emission scenarios Ben McMillan on Plausible emission scenarios paulski0 on Plausible emission scenarios Willard on Plausible emission scenarios paulski0 on Plausible emission scenarios Chubbs on Plausible emission scenarios 
Rachel Squirrel- Siliconing the bathroom April 13, 2021
- Rabett Run
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Stoat
- Equity Isn’t Just Ethical, It’s Stupid April 11, 2021
- Open Mind
- COVID-19: Failure July 23, 2020
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Stupid Youtube Tricks: The Video They Don’t Want you to See April 15, 2021
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS March global up by 0.22°C from February. April 13, 2021
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Reproducibility of high resolution reconstruction – one year on October 11, 2020
- James’s Empty Blog
- Speed vs power in Zwift April 14, 2021
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Digital conferences – how might they work? May 10, 2020
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- Reblog: Unintentional entertainment in science writing April 14, 2021
Tag Archives: Scientists
The adults in the room
I was having another discussion on Twitter with Jean Goodwin, who posted the following quote. It’s attributed to Mark Largent and may have been delivered at a AAAS meeting. I’m interested in what other people think of this. I don’t … Continue reading
Posted in ethics, Science, Scientists, The philosophy of science, The scientific method
Tagged AAAS, History of Science, Jean Goodwin, Mark Largent, Scientists
177 Comments
If someone says “deficit model thinking” again I’ll…..
There can be a tendency, often amongst social scientists, to accuse scientists of deficit model thinking. The suggestion is that there are scientists who think hostility to science, or a lack of trust in science, is because of a lack … Continue reading
Marches for Science
Tomorrow is the day of Marches for Science. The idea of a march for science has somewhat divided people, although along rather predictable lines. There’s concern that it will be seen as politicising science. There’s concern that it will be … Continue reading
Posted in Personal, Politics, Research, Science, The scientific method
Tagged Informed, March for Science, Politics, Scientists
46 Comments
Advocacy and scientific credibility
To the surprise of few, I suspect, it appears that scientists can advocate without damaging their, or the scientific community’s, credibility. It’s reported in this paper, [d]oes Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? and is discussed in this … Continue reading
Science communication
I came across a Guardian article called why scientists are losing the fight to communicate science to the public. The only polite way I can describe it is missing the point entirely. The article was motivated by Brian Cox’s appearance … Continue reading
Posted in Personal, Research, Science
Tagged Brian Cox, Guardian, Richard P Grant, Science communication, Scientists
83 Comments
The Scientific Method
I was going to use a New York Times article about the Scientific Method, that Susan highlighted, to say something about the scientific method. From what I’ve seen, the response to the article has been mixed, but I’m going to … Continue reading
