Category Archives: Pseudoscience

Infrared absorption of atmospheric carbon dioxide

Geoff Price made me aware of a paper, by an apparently highly published physicist, that considers the infrared absorption of atmospheric carbon. It concludes that CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas and cannot be accepted as the main driver … Continue reading

Posted in Climate sensitivity, physicists, Pseudoscience, Research, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , , , | 27 Comments

Bruno Latour

I came across an interesting interview with Bruno Latour, a sociologist with an interest in Science and Techology Studies (STS), who was involved with what has been called the “science wars”. I actually found much of what he said in … Continue reading

Posted in Pseudoscience, Scientists, The philosophy of science, The scientific method | Tagged , , , , | 89 Comments

The Virial Theorem

I had another brief Twitter discussion with Ned Nikolov, whose paper I discussed in this post. Ned seems to think that there is no atmospheric greenhouse effect and that the enhanced surface temperature is due to atmospheric pressure somehow enhancing … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Comedy, Global warming, physicists, Pseudoscience | Tagged , , , , | 125 Comments

STS: All talk and no walk?

In my previous post I discussed a paper by Harry Collins, and colleagues, that is mainly a response to an editorial by Sergio Sismondo. Collins et al. argue that Science and Technology Studies (STS) must take some responsibility for today’s … Continue reading

Posted in Politics, Pseudoscience, Research, Science, Scientists, The philosophy of science, The scientific method, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 50 Comments

What does the Vostok ice core tell us?

Euan Mearns, who runs a blog called Energy Matters, had a post in 2014 about The Vostok ice core: Temperature CO2 and CH4. This post has apparently had 8000 reads, is probably one of the most read texts on the … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, Greenhouse effect, Pseudoscience, Research, Science | Tagged , , , , , | 72 Comments

Oh no, not again

Somehow a paper arguing that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is mostly natural has managed to pass peer-review. Gavin Schmidt’s already covered it in a Realcimate post. Gavin Cawley’s paper is, in a sense, a pre-emptive response to this new … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, IPCC, Pseudoscience, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | 65 Comments