Recent Comments
Steven Mosher on Stay in your own lane? Steven Mosher on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? Steven Mosher on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? JCH on Stay in your own lane? Steven Mosher on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? 
Rachel Squirrel- Exit strategies and collateral damage April 5, 2020
- Rabett Run
- Mask 'em if you got 'em - but don't buy them, yet March 30, 2020
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Forced variations: Apr 2020 April 1, 2020
- Stoat
- Coronavirus days: masks April 3, 2020
- Open Mind
- Climate denial crock of the week
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- March global surface TempLS down 0.151°C from February. April 4, 2020
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- COVID-19, climate and the plague of preprints March 28, 2020
- James’s Empty Blog
- A time to die? April 5, 2020
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- I got a letter from the government… March 29, 2020
Category Archives: Greenhouse effect
Flight free talk
I gave my first ever public climate science talk at a Flight Free event in Edinburgh. If you’re interested in seeing my talk slides, you can download them here. The idea behind Flight Free is to encourage people to pledge … Continue reading
Posted in Carbon tax, Climate change, Greenhouse effect, Personal, Scientists
Tagged Anna Hughes, Edinburgh, Flight free 2020, Flight Free UK, Joanna Haig
208 Comments
A little knowledge
There is apparently a paper from a couple of years ago that is currently doing the rounds and that argues that the Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law Points to a Very Low Climate Sensitivity. The suggestion is … Continue reading
Models are failed hypotheses!
John Christy has written a report for the Global Warming Policy Foundation called climate models have been predicting too much warming. The basic conclusion of the report is that climate models predict far more warming in the tropical troposphere than … Continue reading
2017: A year in review
I’ve now been writing this blog for almost 5 years and I still don’t quite know what I’m trying to achieve, if anything. Hopefully a blog that presents a reasonable representation of our current understanding of climate science, while also … Continue reading
Arguing about the greenhouse effect – again
There’s been a rather lengthy Twitter thread about the greenhouse effect. In particular, focusing on claims that there is no such thing. Of course, engaging in such discussions so as to actually change anyone’s minds is pointless. However, I think … Continue reading
Machine unlearning
Someone sent me a paper by John Abbot and Jennifer Marohasy called the application of machine learning for evaluating anthropogenic versus natural climate change. Their conclusion is that most of the observed warming could be natural and that the Equilibrium … Continue reading
No, pressure alone does not define surface temperatures!
Eli’s already covered this but I thought I would present a slightly different argument. The topic is a recent paper by Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller called new insights on the physical nature of the atmospheric greenhouse effect deduced from … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Greenhouse effect, Research, Science
Tagged Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect, Karl Zeller, Ned Nikolov, OMICS, Pseudoscience
134 Comments
