-
Recent Posts
- How we frame extreme weather events April 1, 2023
- The origins debate March 13, 2023
- Methane, again. March 9, 2023
- Conflicts of Interest March 7, 2023
- Escape from model land February 17, 2023
- The PoNo Principle February 12, 2023
- Climate science as a social process February 5, 2023
- The Escalator February 2, 2023
Recent Comments
Steven Mosher on The origins debate Jon Kirwan on The origins debate Susan Anderson on The origins debate smallbluemike on How we frame extreme weather… Everett F Sargent on How we frame extreme weather… Willard on How we frame extreme weather… Willard on How we frame extreme weather… JCH on The origins debate Dave_Geologist on How we frame extreme weather… ...and Then There's… on How we frame extreme weather… Archives
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (8)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (5)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (6)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (5)
- December 2020 (6)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (9)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (8)
- November 2019 (8)
- October 2019 (9)
- September 2019 (9)
- August 2019 (8)
- July 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (8)
- April 2019 (8)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (7)
- January 2019 (11)
- December 2018 (9)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (9)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (8)
- May 2018 (9)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (9)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (9)
- December 2017 (10)
- November 2017 (9)
- October 2017 (12)
- September 2017 (14)
- August 2017 (12)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (9)
- May 2017 (11)
- April 2017 (15)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (10)
- January 2017 (14)
- December 2016 (9)
- November 2016 (10)
- October 2016 (9)
- September 2016 (11)
- August 2016 (12)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (12)
- April 2016 (13)
- March 2016 (13)
- February 2016 (12)
- January 2016 (18)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (22)
- October 2015 (19)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (14)
- July 2015 (9)
- June 2015 (15)
- May 2015 (17)
- April 2015 (16)
- March 2015 (15)
- February 2015 (15)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (14)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (20)
- September 2014 (13)
- August 2014 (20)
- July 2014 (13)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (15)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (19)
- February 2014 (17)
- January 2014 (23)
- December 2013 (23)
- November 2013 (22)
- October 2013 (29)
- September 2013 (27)
- August 2013 (29)
- July 2013 (37)
- June 2013 (34)
- May 2013 (49)
- April 2013 (33)
- advocacy Anthony Watts ClimateBall Climate change Climate sensitivity Comedy ENSO Environmental change ethics Gavin Schmidt Global warming Greenhouse effect IPCC Judith Curry Michael Mann Personal Philosophy for Bloggers physicists Policy Politics Pseudoscience Research Satire Science Scientists Sound Science (tm) The philosophy of science The scientific method Uncategorized Watts Up With That
- Follow …and Then There's Physics on WordPress.com
-
Join 15,973 other subscribers
Top Posts & Pages
Rachel Squirrel
- Peluang Menang Poker Online Yang Efektif December 8, 2022
Rabett Run
- What do physicists want? February 15, 2023
HotWhopper
Variable Variability
- One more reason I dislike linking climate change and extinction August 23, 2022
RealClimate
- Unforced Variations: Apr 2023 April 1, 2023
Open Mind
- A High Schooler’s Take on the Climate Crisis August 5, 2022
Climate denial crock of the week
robertscribbler
Moyhu
- CFACT says Net Zero is impossible? Debunked. March 21, 2023
Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
James’s Empty Blog
- No comment necessary November 18, 2022
More than just data
- EGU 2022: Back in person May 29, 2022
Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
Symptons of the Universe
- PhD opening in Nottingham Nanoscience Group: AI & Atoms February 16, 2023
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsBlogs I Follow
- ...and Then There's Physics
- Neverending Audit
- James' Empty Blog
- Isaac Held's Blog
- izen
- EssaysConcerning
- ClimateBall
- Vitamin CCS
- rachel.blog
- Lawrence Torcello
- Small Epiphanies
- Real Skeptic
- Critical Angle
- Gra Machree
- Open Parachute
- Simple Climate
- Stoat
- From a Glaciers Perspective
- Variable Variability
- THE CLIMATE WARS
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- robertscribbler
- Climate Denial Crock of the Week
- DeSmog
- RealClimate
- Idiot Tracker
- Graham Readfearn
- Skepticblog
- What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.
- Rabett Run
- Watching the Deniers
- HotWhopper
- ThinkProgress - Medium
- Skeptical Science
- Wott's Up With That?
- Open Mind
Monthly Archives: May 2016
Popper
There’s an interesting recent paper, that Willard will probably appreciate, called why Popper can’t resolve the debate over global warming: Problems with the uses of philosophy of science in the media and public framing of the science of global warming. … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Global warming, Science
Tagged AGW, Falsification, Philosophy of science, Popper, science
262 Comments
Science communication
I’ve been away at a meeting for a couple of days and have been too busy to write any posts, or even think about what to write. Like Eli, however, I’m also still somewhat mystified by the consensus messaging wars. … Continue reading
TBH, I don’t really like consensus messaging either
I might have to give Dan Kahan some credit. Even though I’m not convinced that consensus messaging is toxic and polarising in general, there are certainly circumstances in which it can be, as I discovered – again – on Twitter … Continue reading
Consensus messaging – again
I’ve written before about my views with respect to consensus messaging. It seems to be a topic that divides opinion, but there was a recent paper suggesting that perceived scientific agreement is an important gateway belief, ultimately influencing public responses … Continue reading
Posted in ClimateBall, Comedy, Global warming
Tagged 97%, AGW, Consensus, Consensus messaging, Dan Kahan, Lawrence Torcello
204 Comments
Thousands of exoplanets!
I was quoted in the newspaper today. One problem with talking to journalists, is that you don’t always know quite how they’re going to represent what you said, or – even – if you’re going to end up having said … Continue reading
Posted in Personal, Science
Tagged Exoplanets, HD219134b, Kepler, Kepler satellite, Kepler-78b, NASA, Radial velocity, Rocky planets, Sunday Herald, Transits
44 Comments
ECS ~1K?????
There is a new paper that is being somewhat uncritically accepted at the new Climate “Skepticism” site (and, yes, the inverted commas are necessary) and at Bishop Hill. It’s by someone called J. Ray Bates and claims to estimate climate … Continue reading
The uncertainty on the mean
I wrote a quick post about Gavin Schmidt’s post comparing models to the satellite datasets. I thought Gavin’s post was very good, and explained the various issues really well. Steve McIntyre, however, is claiming that Schmidt’s histogram doesn’t refute Christy. … Continue reading
Models versus satellites
A graph that is fairly commonly promoted to – apparently – illustrate that models and observations have diverged, is one produced by John Christy which compares models to satellite/balloon data for the troposphere. Ignoring all the potential issues with this … Continue reading
97%
Every Friday morning, someone at my Institute gives a short talk, while everyone else drinks coffee and eats doughnuts (well, the doughnuts are actually hidden till the end, so that everyone who wants a doughnut has to stay for the … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, ClimateBall, Global warming, IPCC, Science, Uncategorized
Tagged Coffee talk, Consensus messaging, Consensus on consensus, Dan Kahan, Ice age
139 Comments
A Tmin bias?
I ended up in a discussion with Roger Pielke Sr about a claim that there is a warm bias in Tmin. It ended rarely sourly when I pointed out that accusing an entire scientific discipline of being dysfunctional because they … Continue reading