Recent Comments
Susan Anderson on The tragedy of climate change… David B Benson on The tragedy of climate change… Susan Anderson on The tragedy of climate change… Susan Anderson on The tragedy of climate change… Susan Anderson on The tragedy of climate change… David B Benson on The tragedy of climate change… russellseitz on The tragedy of climate change… citizenschallenge on The tragedy of climate change… thomaswfuller2 on The tragedy of climate change… Ben McMillan on The tragedy of climate change… 
Rachel Squirrel- Allotment produce in January and Veganuary January 23, 2022
- Rabett Run
- "We Buy Hucks" January 23, 2022
- HotWhopper
- Email went down, now it's back August 12, 2021
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Another dot on the graph January 15, 2022
- Stoat
- Mind-gargling ignorance just doesn't aid in saving the planet January 12, 2022
- Open Mind
- Happy New Year! Crappy Start! January 2, 2022
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Music Break: Keb’ Mo’ – Lean on Me January 23, 2022
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS October global temperature up by 0.07°C from September. November 14, 2021
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Resampling Assemblage Counts September 13, 2021
- James’s Empty Blog
- Omicron December 19, 2021
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- More than just data
- vEGU2021: A “zoom” into science May 1, 2021
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- Death of the Lecture: Musings of a second year student January 12, 2022
Category Archives: The scientific method
How scientists failed the pandemic test
Philip Ball has an interesting article about UK science advice called [q]uiet, uncritical, obedient: how the UK’s scientists failed the pandemic test. It make some good points about there appearing to have been collusion between the science advisors and the … Continue reading
Maybe a little science denial is actually in order?
I ended up in a brief discussion on Twitter with Matthew Nisbet, Professor of Communication, Public Policy, and Urban Affairs at Northeastern University, and Sander van der Linden, Professor of Social Psychology in Society at the University of Cambridge. Matthew Nisbet … Continue reading
Some reflections on (corona) truth wars
I wrote this in response to a paper by Jaron Harambam called The Corona Truth Wars, published in a journal called Science and Technology Studies. I submitted it to this journal but it was (desk?) rejected because they felt that … Continue reading
Science in the Time of COVID-19
There was an interesting BBC Radio 4 item, hosted by Sonia Sodha, on Science in the Time of COVID-19. If you can’t access it, there is a related Guardian article. I’ve listened to it a few times, and I’m still … Continue reading
The social construction of science
Richard Dawkins posted a tweet that cause a bit of a furore in some sectors of Twitter. He did try to clarify, but it still didn’t go down well. The problem with his tweet is that science clearly is socially … Continue reading
Alan’s Bottle
Me and Ken just had a talk over the Science Kerfuffle of the moment, featuring a physics and maths teacher known to pwn fashionable nonsense fans. He recently suggested that POMO weakened our herd immunity to combat objective untruths. He … Continue reading
A little domain knowledge can go a long way
A rather bizarre paper has been published in Scientific Reports (yes, that Scientific Reports) claiming that [an] earth system model shows self-sustained melting of permafrost even if all man-made GHG emissions stop in 2020. One immediate problem is that the … Continue reading
Namecalling in science
A couple of days ago, I retweeted an article with the title [t]he trouble with ‘Covid denialism’. I thought the article was reasonable, but some objected to the use of ‘denialism’. There are a number of very credible scientists who … Continue reading
Posted in ClimateBall, Personal, Philosophy for Bloggers, The scientific method, We Are Science
Tagged COVID-19, denial, Denialism, Namecalling
171 Comments
The long-term CovidSim predictions from Report 9
A group of us have just had a paper published in The British Medical Journal on the effect of school closures on mortality from the coronavirus disease. The coverage has been rather unfortunate, as it is being interpreted as supporting … Continue reading
Posted in Research, Scientists, The scientific method
Tagged British Medical Journal, COVID-19, CovidSim, Herd immunity, Lockdown, Neil Ferguson
205 Comments
Understanding methane
There was a recent Conversation article about methane called Climate explained: methane is short-lived in the atmosphere but leaves long-term damage that caused a bit of a stir on Twitter. One way people assess the significance of different greenhouse gases, … Continue reading
...and Then There's Physics 