Recent Comments
Steven Mosher on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? JCH on Stay in your own lane? Steven Mosher on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? Joshua on Stay in your own lane? anoilman on Stay in your own lane? izen on Stay in your own lane? 
Rachel Squirrel- Exit strategies and collateral damage April 5, 2020
- Rabett Run
- Mask 'em if you got 'em - but don't buy them, yet March 30, 2020
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Forced variations: Apr 2020 April 1, 2020
- Stoat
- Coronavirus days: masks April 3, 2020
- Open Mind
- Climate denial crock of the week
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- March global surface TempLS down 0.151°C from February. April 4, 2020
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- COVID-19, climate and the plague of preprints March 28, 2020
- James’s Empty Blog
- A time to die? April 5, 2020
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- I got a letter from the government… March 29, 2020
Tag Archives: climate science
Sometimes it’s never good enough
I’ve, in the past, suggested that climate scientists could end up being criticised whatever happens. If the impact of climate change ends up being less severe than it could have been, climate scientists will probably be criticised for being alarmists. … Continue reading
Andrew Dessler rebuts Roy Spencer
Most of the focus at the moment is rightly on the coronavirus. Since I have no relevant expertise whatsoever, all I’ll say is that I hope everyone is doing their best to stay safe, and listening to the advice that’s … Continue reading
Science is a messy process
I was invited to speak at a Contemporary Climate meeting in Edinburgh’s School of Geosciences. It was really nice to talk face-to-face with people about some of the topics I find interesting. We covered aspects of blogging and social media, … Continue reading
Five dimensions of climate science reductionism
Since I’ve been writing about social science papers recently, there are a couple of others I wanted to mention. I discovered that James has already covered one, so I don’t need to say more. The other is a paper called … Continue reading
THE GWPF’s annual lecture
Since I had nothing better to do with my afternoon, I watched the Global Warming Policy Foundation’s (GWPF) Annual Lecture, given this year by Richard Lindzen. If you really want to watch it, you can find the link here, but … Continue reading
Mertonian norms
There are a set of norms of science, first presented by Robert K Merton and known as the Mertonian norms. I found what seems to be a good description of them here. There are four Mertonian norms, called universalism, communalism, … Continue reading
Hearing about climate science and the scientific method
I’ve been travelling and so haven’t really had much chance to keep up with what’s going on. I have, however, finally managed to watch the Congressional Hearing on Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications and the Scientific Method. It was all … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, Judith Curry, Michael Mann, The philosophy of science, The scientific method, Uncategorized
Tagged climate science, Congressional hearing, Global warming, John Christy, Judith Curry, Lamar Smith, Michael Mann, Roger Pielke Jr
84 Comments
