Recent Comments
smallbluemike on Agricultural emissions jacksmith4tx on Agricultural emissions David B Benson on Agricultural emissions Ben McMillan on Agricultural emissions Willard on Agricultural emissions Everett F Sargent on Agricultural emissions Everett F Sargent on Agricultural emissions Everett F Sargent on Agricultural emissions Ben McMillan on Agricultural emissions Willard on Agricultural emissions 
Rachel Squirrel- Ten years on from Christchurch – February 22nd 2011 February 22, 2021
- Rabett Run
- Libel lawsuits and the truth in the Post-Trump era February 6, 2021
- HotWhopper
- Variable Variability
- RealClimate
- Regional information for society (RifS) and unresolved issues February 14, 2021
- Stoat
- Rush February 18, 2021
- Open Mind
- COVID-19: Failure July 23, 2020
- Climate denial crock of the week
- Is Texans Anger at Grid Collapse a Game Changer? February 24, 2021
- robertscribbler
- Moyhu
- GISS January global up by 0.06°C from December. February 12, 2021
- uknowispeaksense
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Real Sceptic
- Choosing Alternative Medicine To Treat Cancer Is Deadly October 25, 2017
- Musings on Quantitative Palaeoecology
- Reproducibility of high resolution reconstruction – one year on October 11, 2020
- James’s Empty Blog
- BlueSkiesResearch.org.uk: So near and yet not quite… January 19, 2021
- Isaac Held’s Blog
- 73. Tuning to the global mean temperature record November 28, 2016
- More than just data
- Digital conferences – how might they work? May 10, 2020
- Mallemaroking
- A comment piece on the SROCC September 26, 2019
- Symptons of the Universe
- Primal Beat Therapy February 13, 2021
Tag Archives: climate science
Sometimes it’s never good enough
I’ve, in the past, suggested that climate scientists could end up being criticised whatever happens. If the impact of climate change ends up being less severe than it could have been, climate scientists will probably be criticised for being alarmists. … Continue reading
Andrew Dessler rebuts Roy Spencer
Most of the focus at the moment is rightly on the coronavirus. Since I have no relevant expertise whatsoever, all I’ll say is that I hope everyone is doing their best to stay safe, and listening to the advice that’s … Continue reading
Science is a messy process
I was invited to speak at a Contemporary Climate meeting in Edinburgh’s School of Geosciences. It was really nice to talk face-to-face with people about some of the topics I find interesting. We covered aspects of blogging and social media, … Continue reading
Five dimensions of climate science reductionism
Since I’ve been writing about social science papers recently, there are a couple of others I wanted to mention. I discovered that James has already covered one, so I don’t need to say more. The other is a paper called … Continue reading
THE GWPF’s annual lecture
Since I had nothing better to do with my afternoon, I watched the Global Warming Policy Foundation’s (GWPF) Annual Lecture, given this year by Richard Lindzen. If you really want to watch it, you can find the link here, but … Continue reading
Mertonian norms
There are a set of norms of science, first presented by Robert K Merton and known as the Mertonian norms. I found what seems to be a good description of them here. There are four Mertonian norms, called universalism, communalism, … Continue reading
Hearing about climate science and the scientific method
I’ve been travelling and so haven’t really had much chance to keep up with what’s going on. I have, however, finally managed to watch the Congressional Hearing on Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications and the Scientific Method. It was all … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Global warming, Judith Curry, Michael Mann, The philosophy of science, The scientific method, Uncategorized
Tagged climate science, Congressional hearing, Global warming, John Christy, Judith Curry, Lamar Smith, Michael Mann, Roger Pielke Jr
84 Comments
Informing versus convincing
I want to clarify something about yesterday’s post that seems to have at least got one person up in arms. The key point that I was trying to get across (and that I think is the same as Michael Tobis’s … Continue reading
Matt Ridley’s lecture
I thought I might make some points about Matt Ridley’s recent lecture. There are two general points I want to make. Matt Ridley might have a PhD (DPhil technically) and he might have published some papers in the 1980s, but … Continue reading
Posted in Climate change, Climate sensitivity, ClimateBall, Greenhouse effect, IPCC, Policy, Politics, Science
Tagged climate science, Gish Gallop, Greening, GWPF, Matt Ridley, Ranga Myeni, Richard Betts, Royal Society
132 Comments
Less science, more social science!
Stoat has a new post called climate science identifies the problem – it can’t tell us what to do in response and – as he says – this is pretty bleedin’ obvious. Science can clearly provide information as to how … Continue reading
